The recent Executive Council (EC) meeting approved two documents that will be useful for branches.
Tweet
Ian Allinson's blog about Unite the Union (the biggest union in UK & Ireland)
The recent Executive Council (EC) meeting approved two documents that will be useful for branches.
Labels: branches, Executive Council, rules
Yesterday the government announced its plans to cut the minimum period for employers consulting their employees before making large scale redundancies from 90 days to 45 days. It's already easier to cut jobs in the UK than in many other countries, but the Tories and Lib Dems want to make it easier still.
The 90 day period only applies where an employer plans to dismiss 100 or more staff through redundancy in one establishment, so this change only affects bigger employers.
I was pleased to see that UNITE promptly put out a press release attacking the move. This is an issue we should take into the workplaces too. Many employees, whether union members or not, know from bitter experience how important the consultation period is for protecting jobs. We need to mobilise them against this threat.
The consultation period is supposed to allow employees, usually through their unions, to get information from the employer and put forward ideas for avoiding the redundancies, reducing the numbers of redundancies, and mitigating the consequences of the redundancies if they go ahead. This process often does save jobs. Cutting the time available means fewer jobs will be saved.
The consultation period is also useful for individuals. It gives them time to consider their options, to seek redeployment within the company and to look for work outside. In my own workplace we have negotiated time periods better than the existing legal minimum and this has been a major factor in securing redeployment within the company for many staff. Shorter consultation periods mean fewer redeployments, more lives wrecked and employers wasting more money making staff redundant and then hiring new ones.
There's another factor in this which unions need to take very seriously indeed. The change would, when combined with the anti-union laws, make it extremely difficult for members to take lawful industrial action in defence of jobs. The anti-union laws require the union to provide the employer with an accurate breakdown of the numbers and categories of members to be balloted 7 days before a ballot opens. Preparing this can take weeks. Ballots rarely run for less than two weeks, after which the union has to give another 7 days notice to the employer before lawful industrial action can begin. So even if the union is perfectly prepared and can issue the notice of ballot instantly, without any checking of membership records (pigs might fly) you still need a minimum of about 4 weeks before action can begin. If the government goes ahead with this I foresee more and more workers feeling that the anti-union laws give them no way of defending their jobs lawfully and deciding to take unofficial action instead.
I heard one government spokes-idiot referring to the proposed change as getting a better balance between employers and workers. The employer-employee relationship is an inherently unequal one and rarely more so than in a redundancy situation. Can workers decide to make their bosses redundant? Yet the Tories and Liberal Democrats obviously think that the feeble employment protection workers currently enjoy gives workers too much power in the relationship and it needs to be reduced! Is it too much to ask that Labour's front bench vigorously oppose this?
The proposals are fully in tune with the overall government approach, which sees working tax credits and other benefits being cut for the poorest, while corporation tax is cut for their city mates.
Labels: anti-union laws, jobs, Labour, law, Lib Dems, politics, redundancy, tax, Tories, unemployment, welfare state
I joined a protest today at Fiddlers Ferry power station marking five years that Steve Acheson has been protesting there.
Labels: blacklisting, construction, law
Labels: manchester, Tesco, Unite the Resistance
A page has been set up on the new UNITE web site for details of the UNITE General Secretary election 2013.
Labels: general secretary, unite elections
The report below is incomplete - I will update it to add more, but I thought it worth posting now as I'm getting so many questions. As well as the points marked where incomplete, there are whole sections still to put in.
UNITE members at Eddie Stobart in Doncaster start an all-out strike tonight against plans to get rid of them straight after they were outsourced byTesco.
They will be protesting at Tesco stores and are holding a demonstration in Doncaster on Saturday.
For more information, see the UNITE press release.
Many workers across all sectors are affected by outsourcing and the weak protection offered by the TUPE regulations. We should all get behind the members at Eddie Stobart and put as much pressure on Tesco to sort this out as possible.
Labels: jobs, outsourcing, Tesco, TUPE
UNITE has launched a new web site at the same address - www.unitetheunion.org.
Unfortunately this means links to pages on the old site no longer work - and the error page doesn't suggest a solution (hopefully this will be fixed soon).
In broken web addresses (URLs) replacing "www" with "archive" should take you to the old page - for example the new rulebook is now via http://archive.unitetheunion.org/about_us/structure.aspx
I will go through this site and try to update all the links when I get the time.
Following a statement from the General Secretary, the majority of the UNITE Executive Council (EC) today agreed the following statement:
GENERAL SECRETARY ELECTION
The Executive Council welcomes the progress made towards creating a common Unite constitution, structure and culture over the last two years, and believes that the benefits of this are starting to be felt throughout the union and the wider labour movement.
With a devastating economic crisis unfolding, the need throughout the movement for clear and purposeful leadership will be of continuing importance. Unite's own further integration and development would also be enhanced by clarity and stability regarding the union's leadership over the next period.
The Executive Council also notes that rule 15.2 mandates that the next General Secretary election will take place in 2015, at the same time as the General Election itself is scheduled. Any outcome of the General Election will certainly raise important issues for Unite and its membership, in particular in relation to our political strategy and our links with the Labour Party, requiring strong leadership at that time. It will be no time for a vacuum such as would inevitably be the consequence of a General Secretary election campaign at the same time.
In the light of these considerations, the Executive Council resolves to hold an election for the post of Unite General Secretary as soon as practicable, and directs the Chief of Staff to bring forward proposals to this end.I expect the Chief of Staff to bring forward the proposals for the timetable and conduct of the election so that they can be decided at the Executive Council meeting which continues this week.
An updated version of the UNITE Rulebook is now available via here.
This includes recent amendments to the rules as well as the Executive Council's guidance on interpretation of rules.
Labels: Executive Council, rules