The recent Executive Council (EC) meeting approved two documents that will be useful for branches.
Tweet
Ian Allinson's blog about Unite the Union (the biggest union in UK & Ireland)
The recent Executive Council (EC) meeting approved two documents that will be useful for branches.
Labels: branches, Executive Council, rules
Yesterday the government announced its plans to cut the minimum period for employers consulting their employees before making large scale redundancies from 90 days to 45 days. It's already easier to cut jobs in the UK than in many other countries, but the Tories and Lib Dems want to make it easier still.
The 90 day period only applies where an employer plans to dismiss 100 or more staff through redundancy in one establishment, so this change only affects bigger employers.
I was pleased to see that UNITE promptly put out a press release attacking the move. This is an issue we should take into the workplaces too. Many employees, whether union members or not, know from bitter experience how important the consultation period is for protecting jobs. We need to mobilise them against this threat.
The consultation period is supposed to allow employees, usually through their unions, to get information from the employer and put forward ideas for avoiding the redundancies, reducing the numbers of redundancies, and mitigating the consequences of the redundancies if they go ahead. This process often does save jobs. Cutting the time available means fewer jobs will be saved.
The consultation period is also useful for individuals. It gives them time to consider their options, to seek redeployment within the company and to look for work outside. In my own workplace we have negotiated time periods better than the existing legal minimum and this has been a major factor in securing redeployment within the company for many staff. Shorter consultation periods mean fewer redeployments, more lives wrecked and employers wasting more money making staff redundant and then hiring new ones.
There's another factor in this which unions need to take very seriously indeed. The change would, when combined with the anti-union laws, make it extremely difficult for members to take lawful industrial action in defence of jobs. The anti-union laws require the union to provide the employer with an accurate breakdown of the numbers and categories of members to be balloted 7 days before a ballot opens. Preparing this can take weeks. Ballots rarely run for less than two weeks, after which the union has to give another 7 days notice to the employer before lawful industrial action can begin. So even if the union is perfectly prepared and can issue the notice of ballot instantly, without any checking of membership records (pigs might fly) you still need a minimum of about 4 weeks before action can begin. If the government goes ahead with this I foresee more and more workers feeling that the anti-union laws give them no way of defending their jobs lawfully and deciding to take unofficial action instead.
I heard one government spokes-idiot referring to the proposed change as getting a better balance between employers and workers. The employer-employee relationship is an inherently unequal one and rarely more so than in a redundancy situation. Can workers decide to make their bosses redundant? Yet the Tories and Liberal Democrats obviously think that the feeble employment protection workers currently enjoy gives workers too much power in the relationship and it needs to be reduced! Is it too much to ask that Labour's front bench vigorously oppose this?
The proposals are fully in tune with the overall government approach, which sees working tax credits and other benefits being cut for the poorest, while corporation tax is cut for their city mates.
Labels: anti-union laws, jobs, Labour, law, Lib Dems, politics, redundancy, tax, Tories, unemployment, welfare state
I joined a protest today at Fiddlers Ferry power station marking five years that Steve Acheson has been protesting there.
Labels: blacklisting, construction, law
Labels: manchester, Tesco, Unite the Resistance
A page has been set up on the new UNITE web site for details of the UNITE General Secretary election 2013.
Labels: general secretary, unite elections
The report below is incomplete - I will update it to add more, but I thought it worth posting now as I'm getting so many questions. As well as the points marked where incomplete, there are whole sections still to put in.
UNITE members at Eddie Stobart in Doncaster start an all-out strike tonight against plans to get rid of them straight after they were outsourced byTesco.
They will be protesting at Tesco stores and are holding a demonstration in Doncaster on Saturday.
For more information, see the UNITE press release.
Many workers across all sectors are affected by outsourcing and the weak protection offered by the TUPE regulations. We should all get behind the members at Eddie Stobart and put as much pressure on Tesco to sort this out as possible.
Labels: jobs, outsourcing, Tesco, TUPE
UNITE has launched a new web site at the same address - www.unitetheunion.org.
Unfortunately this means links to pages on the old site no longer work - and the error page doesn't suggest a solution (hopefully this will be fixed soon).
In broken web addresses (URLs) replacing "www" with "archive" should take you to the old page - for example the new rulebook is now via http://archive.unitetheunion.org/about_us/structure.aspx
I will go through this site and try to update all the links when I get the time.
Following a statement from the General Secretary, the majority of the UNITE Executive Council (EC) today agreed the following statement:
GENERAL SECRETARY ELECTION
The Executive Council welcomes the progress made towards creating a common Unite constitution, structure and culture over the last two years, and believes that the benefits of this are starting to be felt throughout the union and the wider labour movement.
With a devastating economic crisis unfolding, the need throughout the movement for clear and purposeful leadership will be of continuing importance. Unite's own further integration and development would also be enhanced by clarity and stability regarding the union's leadership over the next period.
The Executive Council also notes that rule 15.2 mandates that the next General Secretary election will take place in 2015, at the same time as the General Election itself is scheduled. Any outcome of the General Election will certainly raise important issues for Unite and its membership, in particular in relation to our political strategy and our links with the Labour Party, requiring strong leadership at that time. It will be no time for a vacuum such as would inevitably be the consequence of a General Secretary election campaign at the same time.
In the light of these considerations, the Executive Council resolves to hold an election for the post of Unite General Secretary as soon as practicable, and directs the Chief of Staff to bring forward proposals to this end.I expect the Chief of Staff to bring forward the proposals for the timetable and conduct of the election so that they can be decided at the Executive Council meeting which continues this week.
An updated version of the UNITE Rulebook is now available via here.
This includes recent amendments to the rules as well as the Executive Council's guidance on interpretation of rules.
Labels: Executive Council, rules
Well done to Jamie-Max Caldwell who has produced this short video for Unite into Schools explaining what unions are and what we've achieved. It's easy for older union activists to take for granted that people understand what unions are and how they work - doing so can be a real barrier to organising young people.
Labels: education, organising, young people
A couple of weeks ago I was part of a delegation to the national conference of Unite the Resistance, which attracted around 1000 debating how we build the fightback.
There's a report on the Unite the Resistance web site, videos here and here along with the statement agreed by conference. Here's Gill George's speech on the attacks on our NHS and the fight-back against them:
Labels: conference, NHS, Unite the Resistance
The TUC's "Going To Work" web site is promoting a campaign to pressure governments attending the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) conference in Dubai this December to reject proposals for a new treaty that would restrict the freedom of internet users by giving governments and corporations the power to:
Labels: freedom, human rights, international, internet, ITU, ITUC, surveillance, tuc
I posted back in August about HP workers terminating their European Works Council (EWC) agreement in response to the failure to consult properly over massive job cuts.
industriALL, a major union federation which covers IT & Communications, and to which UNITE is affiliated, has built on this by announcing an "HP European Alliance" to coordinate the work of unions, works councils and representatives from the European Works Council - to try to give employees a more effective voice.
It will be interesting to see how this initiative develops. It's common practice for employers to try to play workers in different countries or different unions off against each other, or to try to create conflict between unions and works councils which are each trying to pursue the interests of employees in different ways. Cultural, political, legal and organisational barriers often get in the way of the unity employees need to have an effective voice and it is good to see an attempt to overcome this. Will it help deliver real action to challenge job losses or to curb management by dictat?
Labels: Europe, hp, industriALL, ITC, jobs, redundancy, sector, works councils
Many employers use (and abuse) agency workers - not just to cover short-term fluctuations in workload or to cover absences, but to provide a proportion of the workforce who can be more cheaply dismissed, who have fewer rights and, until recently, who could often be paid less.
The Agency Worker Regulations (AWR), which came into force last year, were intended to partially address this by giving temporary and agency workers some legal protection against unfair treatment.
But as with all legislation, it's not much help if there's no effective enforcement. Whether a law works often comes down to whether individuals know their rights and whether they have the support of union organisation to advise and support them in asserting their rights. And of course where there is good union organisation we should be treating the legislation as a bare minimum and seeking to negotiate standards which are considerably higher wherever possible.
There are now quite a few useful publications to help union members and reps take advantage of the AWR, including:
Labels: agency labour, law, organising, tuc
The CWU and BECTU unions are reporting an initiative by Virgin Media to try to deny staff union recognition.
With no warning, the employer has used a company it has engaged, rather than anyone independent, to run a "ballot" of staff in its Access Division over the company's plan to derecognise the unions. The company has sent staff material explaining its position, not including any material from the unions, and has included in the ballot people who aren't covered by union recognition anyway.
If any union ran an industrial action ballot like this the law would be down on us like a ton of bricks.
This kind of employer action brings back memories for me. I first joined the union at work when my own employer tried to derecognise it. Many others joined at the same time. At the time the union in my workplace wasn't well organised and wasn't very effective for us, but we felt that we, not the company, should choose who represented us. We understood that getting rid of the union was likely to be a precursor to worsening pay, terms and conditions. Our campaign was successful in defending union recognition and the union today is a lot more active and effective than it was then.
I hope staff at Virgin Media are successful in defending their union recognition and come out of the campaign with their organisation reinvigorated.
Labels: bectu, cwu, recognition, union busting, Virgin
Executive Council (EC) members have now been sent a list of UNITE officers and which lay committees they are accountable to, in line with the new rule introduced at the 2011 Rules Conference, which gave the EC the power to:
14.8.5 Determine one or more constitutional committees of lay members to which
each officer employed by the Union shall report and be accountable and
ensure that the list of these allocation sis available to members.
Labels: conference, democracy, Executive Council, ITC, region, rules, sector
I've created a new page on this site as a Glossary & Jargon Buster - I hope you find it useful.
You can help by commenting on that page with suggestions for words and acronyms I should add. If you know the answers, you can help even more by suggesting explanations for them!
I hear from lots of UNITE branch officers who are struggling to do their job under the new arrangements for branches - largely because of a lack of information.
The North-West region has produced a helpful branch officers' pack which includes:
Labels: branches, North-West, region
There's an ITV news report here and the local Express & Star covers it here. UNITE press release here.
Labels: jobs, manufacturing, occupations, redundancy, west midlands
The General Secretary's report from the September 2012 UNITE Executive Council (EC) meeting is now out. I will send it to UNITE members on request.
Labels: Executive Council, general secretary
The various UNITE conferences going on at the moment are leading many activists who have previously concerned themselves only with issues within their own workplace to try to get their heads round UNITE's structure.
One of the questions I am being asked is where an activist would send a remit (the term now used for a motion or resolution) if they wanted it to become UNITE policy and I'll try to answer this question below.
Don't forget that you don't always need to send a remit "all the way" to the Executive Council (EC) - send it as far as is needed to get the action you want. For example sectors have autonomy over sectoral matters so a National Industrial Sector Committee (NISC) should be able to deal with most things without needing to wait for approval from the EC.
Policy Conference
Under Rule 12, UNITE holds a Policy Conference every two years, most recently in June 2012. Each branch and constitutional committee (which means things like Regional Industrial Sector Committees [RISCs], Area Activist Committees [AACs], Regional Committees, Equality Committees but not workplace committees, combines or industrial committees which aren't defined in rule) can submit a motion to Policy Conference, but delegates overwhelmingly come via the industrial sector committees.
Between Policy Conferences
A branch or an individual rep can send remits up through the structure via several routes:
1) To your Area Activists Committee, who can send it on to the Regional Committee, who can send it on to the Executive Council. This route is best for general issues.
2) To your Regional Industrial Sector Committee, who can send it to the Regional Committee, who can send it on to the Executive Council.
3) To your Regional Industrial Sector Committee, who can send it to your National Industrial Sector Committee (NISC) who can send it on to the Executive Council. This is best for issues which are of significant concern to your industrial sector.
4) To one of the Regional Equality Committees, who can send it to the National Equality Committee, who can send it on to the Executive Council. This is best for issues which mainly relate to one strand of equality (i.e. women, disability, LGBT, BAEM, young members, retired members).
5) To one of the Regional Equality Committees, who can send it to the Regional Committee, who can send it to the Executive Council.
More Information
I've gathered a lot of information about UNITE's structures on a separate page.
One effect of the many layers remits have to navigate is that it takes a long time, so it's worth checking the schedule of meetings. The current system makes remits very vulnerable to a cancelled or inquorate meeting anywhere on its route, which can add significant delays too. Personally I preferred the system in Amicus where any branch could send a motion directly to the EC. This, along with the greater frequency of EC meetings meant that there was the potential for the union to be much more responsive. Of course we didn't get a lot of benefit from this as the Amicus EC often voted down potentially useful motions.
Labels: area, BAEM, conference, disability, equality, Executive Council, LGBT, region, retired members, rules, sector, women, young people
Many employers in the IT industry and beyond use the threat of moving work offshore to countries with low wages and few employment rights to try to persuade workers that it would be pointless or counter-productive to defend terms and conditions or fight for decent pay.
UNITE members at Capita IT Services, by voting to strike and calling action, have not only stopped the immediate threat of redundancies and jobs being moved offshore, but also secured a commitment to negotiate a new job security agreement.
This victory contains important lessons for workers in many industries - globalisation does not make workers powerless, if they get organised and are prepared to use the strength they have.
Labels: capita, globalisation, jobs, offshoring, redundancy
When UNITE reps in the IT Services industry were creating our Charter for Fair Pay, one of the issues identified was "forced ranking" - the practice of some companies and managers of pre-determining the proportions of people to receive each score in a performance appraisal system.
There is a mass of evidence about how unfair, discriminatory and counter-productive forced ranking systems are. There's an interesting article by a management consultant here blaming a variant of this system for Microsoft's poor culture and declining financial performance. Useful ammunition for union members seeking to oppose the introduction of forced ranking or throw it out where it's already used.
Labels: age discrimination, equal pay, ITC, Microsoft, pay
Regional Industrial
Sector; Area Activists;
Regional Equalities
&
Regional Political
Committees
|
National Industrial
Sector Committees &
National Political
Committee
|
Regional
Committees
|
National Equalities
Committees
|
During:
|
Between:
|
Between:
|
Between:
|
December 2012
|
Jan 2nd – 21st
|
Jan 22nd – 30th
|
31st Jan – 8th
Feb
|
March 2013
|
April 2nd – 19th
|
April 22nd – 26th
|
29th April – 10th
May
|
June 2013
|
July 1st – 12th
|
July 22nd – 26th
|
July 15th – 19th
|
September 2013
|
Oct 7th – 25th
|
Oct 28th – 1st
Nov
|
Nov 4th – 8th
|
Labels: area, disability, equality, Executive Council, ITC, LGBT, politics, region, retired members, sector, women, young people